Exhibit 99.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Hardie Industries SE |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
22 Pitt Street |
|
|
Sydney NSW 2000 Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
Tel: 02 8274 5239 |
|
|
Fax: 02 8274 5218 |
|
|
|
|
|
GPO Box 3935 |
|
|
Sydney NSW 2001 Australia |
11 July 2011
The Manager
Company Announcements Office
ASX
20 Bridge Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Dear Sir/Madam
James Hardies Notice of Meeting pack and Annual Report mailed to CUFS holders
I enclose a copy of the companys final:
|
|
|
Notice of Meeting for James Hardie Industries 2011 Annual General Meeting, Voting Instruction Form and Question Form; and |
|
|
|
|
2011 Annual Report. |
Yours faithfully
/s/ Marcin Firek
Marcin Firek
Company Secretary
James Hardie Industries SE is a limited liability company incorporated in Ireland with its registered office at Europa House, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Directors: Michael Hammes (Chairman), Brian Anderson (USA), David Dilger, David Harrison (USA), James Osborne, Donald McGauchie (Australia), Rudy van deer Meer (Netherlands).
Chief Executive Officer: Louis Gries
Company number: 485719
|
|
|
2
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF
THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Agenda and Business of the Annual General Meeting
Explanations of the background, further information and reasons for each proposed resolution are
set out in the Explanatory Notes on pages 5 to 12 of this Notice of Meeting.
The following are items of ordinary business:
1. |
|
Financial statements and reports for the year ended 31 March 2011 |
|
|
|
To consider, and if thought fit, pass the following resolution as an ordinary resolution: |
|
|
|
To receive and consider the financial statements and the reports of the Directors and external auditor
thereon for the year ended 31 March 2011. |
|
|
The vote on this resolution is advisory only. |
|
2. |
|
Adoption of the Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 March 2011 |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution as a non-binding ordinary resolution: |
|
|
|
To receive and consider the Remuneration Report of the company for the year ended 31 March 2011. |
|
|
The vote on this resolution is advisory only. |
|
3. |
|
Re-election of directors |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass each of the following resolutions as a separate ordinary
resolution: |
|
(a) |
|
That Mr M Hammes, who retires by rotation in accordance with the Articles of
Association, be re-elected as a director. |
|
|
(b) |
|
That Mr R van der Meer, who retires by rotation in accordance with the Articles of
Association, be re-elected as a director. |
|
|
(c) |
|
That Mr L Gries, who retires in accordance with the Articles of Association, be
re-elected as a director. |
4. |
|
Authority to fix the External Auditors Remuneration |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution as an ordinary resolution: |
|
|
|
That the Board of Directors be authorized to fix the remuneration of the external auditor for the
financial year ended 31 March 2012. |
The following are items of special business:
5. |
|
Grant of Hybrid Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution: |
|
|
|
That the award to the companys Chief Executive Officer, Mr L Gries, of up to a maximum of 769,656 Hybrid
RSUs, and his acquisition of Hybrid RSUs and Shares up to that stated maximum, be approved for all
purposes in accordance with the terms of the Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and on the basis set
out in the following Explanatory Notes. |
6. |
|
Grant of Relative TSR RSUs |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as an ordinary resolution: |
|
|
|
That the award to the companys Chief Executive Officer, Mr L Gries, of up to a maximum of 719,593 Relative
TSR RSUs, and his acquisition of Relative TSR RSUs and Shares up to that stated maximum, be
approved for all purposes in accordance with the terms of the LTIP and on the basis set out in the
following Explanatory Notes. |
7. |
|
Amendment and Restatement of James Hardie Industries Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following as a special resolution: |
|
|
|
That the James Hardie Equity Incentive Plan be amended and restated, on the basis set out in the Explanatory Notes. |
Voting Exclusion Statement
In accordance with the ASX Listing Rules, the company will disregard any votes cast on Resolutions
5 and 6 of this Notice of Meeting if they are cast by any director and his or her associates.
People who fall into the categories listed above will not have their votes disregarded if:
(i) |
|
they are acting as a proxy for a person who is entitled to vote, in accordance with the directions
on a Voting Instruction Form; or |
|
(ii) |
|
they are chairing the meeting as proxy for a person who is
entitled to vote, in accordance with a direction on a Voting Instruction Form to vote as the proxy decides. |
Notes on voting and Explanatory Notes follow, and a Voting Instruction Form and Question Form are
enclosed.
By order of the Board.
Marcin Firek
Company Secretary
11 July 2011
|
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011
|
|
3 |
If you are a CUFS Holder registered at 7:00pm (AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011, you may attend, in
person or appoint a proxy to attend on your behalf, either the AGM in Dublin, Ireland or the
simulcast in Sydney, Australia.
ATTENDANCE AT THE AGM IN DUBLIN, IRELAND
The AGM will be held at the:
Hibernia II Room, Four Seasons Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin Ireland, starting at 7:30am
(Dublin) on Tuesday, 16 August 2011
To appoint a proxy to attend the AGM on your behalf, please
complete the relevant section of the Voting Instruction Form, and return it to Computershare no
later than 4:30pm (AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011 using one of the methods set out under
Lodgement Instructions below.
If you appoint a proxy and your proxy does not attend and vote at the AGM or the simultaneous
meeting in Sydney, your vote will not be counted.
ATTENDANCE AT THE AGM SIMULCAST IN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
The AGM will be simulcast in Sydney at the:
Adelaide Room, Sofitel Sydney Wentworth, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, starting at
4:30pm on Tuesday, 16 August 2011.
CUFS Holders attending the meeting in Sydney will be able to ask questions of the Board and the
external auditor.
VOTING ON THE RESOLUTIONS
How you can vote will depend on whether you are:
|
|
a CUFS Holder (CUFS are quoted on the ASX); or |
|
|
|
an American Depositary Receipt (ADR) holder (ADRs are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)). |
Voting if you are a CUFS Holder: CUFS Holders who want to vote on the resolutions to be considered
at the AGM have the following two options available to them:
|
|
|
Option A |
|
You may lodge a Voting Instruction Form directing CDN
(the legal holder of the shares in the company (Shares) for the purposes of the ASX
Settlement Operating Rules) to nominate the chairman of the AGM as its proxy to vote the
Shares that it holds on your behalf.
To be eligible to vote in this manner, you must be registered as a CUFS Holder at 7:00 pm
(AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011. |
CUFS Holders who select Option A should follow either (1) or (2) below:
1. |
|
Complete the Voting Instruction Form accompanying this Notice of Meeting and lodge it with
Computershare using one of the methods set out under Lodgement Instructions on page 4 of this
Notice of Meeting. |
|
2. |
|
Complete a Voting Instruction Form using the internet: Go to www.investorvote.com.au |
To complete the Voting Instruction Form using the internet, you will need:
|
|
your Control Number (located on your Voting Instruction Form); and |
|
|
|
your Security Holder Reference Number (SRN) or the Holder Identification Number (HIN) from your current James Hardie Industries
SE Holding Statement; and |
|
|
|
your postcode as recorded in the companys register. |
If you lodge the Voting Instruction Form in accordance with these instructions, you will be taken
to have signed it.
Completed Voting Instruction Forms must be received by Computershare no later than 4:30pm (AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011.
|
|
|
Option B |
|
If you would like to attend the AGM or appoint someone else to attend the AGM on your
behalf, whether in Dublin, Ireland or Sydney, Australia, and vote in person, you may use a Voting
Instruction Form to ask CDN to appoint you or another person nominated by you (who
does not need to be a Shareholder) as proxy to vote the Shares underlying your holding of CUFS on behalf of CDN. |
For your proxy appointment to count, your completed Voting Instruction Form must be received by
Computershare no later than 4:30pm (AEST) on 14 August 2011. To obtain a free copy of CDNs
Financial Services Guide (FSG), or any Supplementary FSG, go to www.asx. com.au/cdis or phone 1
300 300 279 from within Australia or +61 1 300 300 279 from outside Australia to ask to have one
sent to you.
If you submit a completed Voting Instruction Form to Computershare, but fail to select either of
Option A or Option B, you are deemed to have selected Option A.
|
|
|
4
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF
THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Voting if you hold ADRs: The Depositary for ADRs held in the companys ADR program is the Bank of
New York Mellon. The Bank of New York Mellon will send this Notice of Meeting to ADR holders on or
about Thursday, 14 July 2011 and advise ADR holders how to give their voting instructions.
To be eligible to vote, ADR holders must be the registered owner as at 5:00pm US Eastern Daylight
Time on Thursday, 7 July 2011 (the ADR record date).
The Bank of New York Mellon must receive any
voting instructions, in the form required by The Bank of New York Mellon, no later than 5.00pm US
Eastern Standard Time on Friday, 5 August 2011. The Bank of New York Mellon will endeavour, as far
as is practicable, to instruct that the Shares ultimately underlying the ADRs are voted in
accordance with the instructions received by The Bank of New York Mellon from ADR holders. If an
ADR holder does not submit any voting instructions, the Shares ultimately underlying the ADRs held
by that holder will not be voted.
Under the recent amendments to New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rule 452 and corresponding NYSE
Listed Company Manual Section 402.08 mandated by Section 957 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act, brokers that are NYSE member organizations are prohibited from
directing the voting of the Shares underlying ADRs held in customer accounts on matters relating
to executive compensation and director elections if they have not received voting instructions
from the beneficial holders. Accordingly, if you are the beneficial owner of Shares underlying
ADRs, and your broker holds your ADRs in its name, then you must instruct your broker as to how to
vote your Shares. Otherwise, your broker may not vote your Shares. If you do not give your broker
voting instructions and the broker does not vote your Shares, this is a broker non-vote which is
treated as a null vote and does not count toward the voting outcome.
LODGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Completed Voting Instruction Forms may be lodged with Computershare using one of the following
methods:
(i) |
|
by post to GPO Box 242, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia; or |
|
(ii) |
|
by delivery to Computershare at Level 4, 60 Carrington Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia; or |
|
(iii) |
|
online at www.investorvote.com.au; or |
|
(iv) |
|
for Intermediary Online subscribers only (custodians), online at www.intermediaryonline.com; or |
|
(v) |
|
by facsimile to 1800 783 447 from inside Australia or +61 3 9473 2555 from outside Australia. |
|
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011
|
|
5 |
Explanatory Notes:
Terminology
References to Shareholders in this Notice of Meeting, including these Explanatory Notes, are
references to all the shareholders of the company acting together, and include CUFS Holders,
holders of ADRs and holders of Shares.
RESOLUTION 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2011
Resolution 1 asks Shareholders to receive and consider the financial statements and the reports of
the Board of Directors and external auditors for the year ended 31 March 2011.
The financial statements which are the subject of Resolution 1 are those prepared in accordance
with Irish modified generally accepted accounting principles (Irish modified GAAP), as distinct
from the US generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) consolidated financial statements
of the James Hardie group as set out in the 2011 Annual Report.
A brief overview of the financial and operating performance of the James Hardie group during the
year ended 31 March 2011 will be provided during the AGM.
Copies of the JHISE consolidated Irish modified GAAP financial statements and are available free of charge either:
(a) |
|
at the AGM in Dublin, Ireland or the simulcast meeting in Sydney, Australia; |
|
(b) |
|
at the companys registered Irish office at Europa House, 2nd Floor, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt
Street, Dublin, Ireland or its registered Australian office at Level 3, 22 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW; or |
|
(c) |
|
on the companys website, in the Investor Relations area, at www.jameshardie.com. |
Recommendation
The Board believes it is in the interests of Shareholders that the financial statements and the
reports of the Directors and external auditor for the year ended 31 March 2011 be received and
considered, and recommends that you vote in favour of the resolution.
RESOLUTION 2 REMUNERATION REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2011
Resolution 2 asks Shareholders to consider and receive the Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 March 2011.
Irish law does not require the company to produce a remuneration report or to submit it to
shareholders. Similarly, the company is not required under the ASX Corporate Governance Council
Principles and Recommendations or section 300A of the Australian Corporations Act to submit a
remuneration report to shareholders for a non-binding vote.
However, taking into consideration the companys large Australian shareholder base, James Hardie
has voluntarily produced a remuneration report for non-binding shareholder approval for some years
and currently intends to continue to do so. This report provides information similar to that
provided by Australian listed companies in their remuneration reports on the companys
remuneration practices in fiscal year 2011 and also voluntarily includes an outline of the
companys proposed remuneration framework for fiscal year 2012.
The companys Remuneration Report is set out on pages 41 to 62 of the 2011 Annual Report and can
also be found in the Investor Relations area of the James Hardie website at www.jameshardie.com.
Although this vote does not bind the company, the Board intends to take the outcome of the vote
into consideration when considering the companys future remuneration policy.
Recommendation
The Board believes it is in the interests of Shareholders that the companys Remuneration Report
for the year ended 31 March 2011 be considered and received, and recommends that you vote in
favour of the resolution.
|
|
|
6
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF
THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
RESOLUTION 3 ELECTION OF BOARD DIRECTORS
Resolutions 3(a) to 3(c) ask Shareholders to consider the re-election of Messrs M Hammes, R van der Meer and L Gries to the Board.
The companys Articles of Association require that one-third of
the directors subject to re-election (other than the Chief Executive Officer) will retire at each
AGM, with re-election possible after each term. Although the ASX Listing Rules do not require the
CEO of a company to stand for re-election, Article 46.1 of the Council Regulations (EC) No
2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European Company (SE) (SE Regulations), which
apply to the company, require each director of the company to be re-elected at least every 6
years. Since Mr L Gries was last elected in 2005, he will retire as a Director at the 2011 AGM.
Messrs M Hammes and R van der Meer, together with L Gries, will retire at the 2011 AGM and each offers himself for re-election.
Profiles of the candidates appear below:
Michael Hammes BS, MBA
Age 69
Michael Hammes was elected as an independent Non-Executive Director of James Hardie in
February 2007. He was appointed Chairman of the Board in January 2008 and, is a member of the Audit
Committee, the Remuneration Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr Hammes was
also a member of the Re-domicile Due Diligence Committee.
Experience: Mr Hammes has extensive commercial experience at a senior executive level. He has held
a number of executive positions in the medical products, hardware and home improvement, and
automobile sectors, including CEO and Chairman of Sunrise Medical, Inc (20002007), Chairman and
CEO of Guide Corporation (19982000), Chairman and CEO of Coleman Company, Inc (19931997), Vice
Chairman of Black & Decker Corporation (19921993) and various senior executive roles with
Chrysler Corporation (19861990) and Ford Motor Company (19791986).
Directorships of listed companies in the past five years: Current Lead Director of Navistar
International Corporation (since 1996) and DynaVox Mayer-Johnson (listed in April 2010).
Other: Resident of the United States.
Last elected: August 2009
Rudy van der Meer M.Ch.Eng
Age 66
Rudy van der Meer was elected as an independent Non-Executive Director of James Hardie in February
2007. He is a member of the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Experience: Mr van der Meer is an experienced executive, with considerable knowledge of
international business and the building and construction sector. During his 32-year association
with Akzo Nobel N.V., he held a number of senior positions including CEO Coatings (20002005),
CEO Chemicals (19932000), and member of the five person Executive Board (19932005).
Directorships of listed companies in the past five years: Current
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Imtech N.V. (since 2005); Director LyondellBasell
Industries NV (since August 2010); Former Member of the Supervisory Board of Hagemeyer N.V.
(20062008).
Other: Chairman of the Board of Energie Beheer Nederland B.V. (since 2006); Chairman of the
Supervisory Board of Univé-VGZ-IZA-Trias (UVIT) Health Insurance (since May 2011); resident of The
Netherlands.
Last elected: August 2009
Louis Gries BSc, MBA
Chief Executive Officer
Age 57
Louis Gries joined James Hardie as Manager of the Fontana fibre cement plant in California in
February 1991 and was appointed President of James Hardie Building Products, Inc in December 1993.
Mr Gries became Executive Vice President Operations in January 2003, responsible for operations,
sales and marketing in our businesses in the Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe.
He was appointed Interim CEO in October 2004 and became CEO in February 2005. Mr Gries was elected
to the Companys Managing Board by CUFS holders at the 2005 AGM and continued as Chairman of the
Managing Board until it was dissolved in June 2010.
Before he joined James Hardie, Mr Gries worked for 13 years for USG Corp, in a variety of roles in
research, plant quality and productions, product and plant management.
Directorships of listed companies in the past five years: Nil.
Other: Resident of the United States.
Last elected: August 2005
Recommendation
The Board, having assessed the performance of Messrs M Hammes, R van der Meer and L Gries, and on
the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, believes it is in the interests of
Shareholders that each of the individuals referred to above be re-elected as a director of the
company, and recommends (with Messrs M Hammes, R van der Meer and L Gries each abstaining from
voting in respect of their own election) that you vote in favour of Resolutions 3(a), 3(b) and 3(c).
|
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011
|
|
7 |
RESOLUTION 4 AUTHORITY TO FIX THE EXTERNAL AUDITORS REMUNERATION
Resolution 4 asks Shareholders to give authority to the Board of Directors to fix the external auditors remuneration.
Ernst & Young LLP were appointed external auditors for the James Hardie Group for the year ended
31 March 2009. The selection of Ernst & Young LLP followed a comprehensive tender and review
process of major accounting firms capable of undertaking James Hardies external audit.
A summary of the external auditors remuneration during the year ended
31 March 2011 as well as non-audit fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP are set out on page 105 of the 2011 Annual Report.
The Audit Committee periodically reviews Ernst & Young LLPs performance and independence as
external auditor and reports its results to the Board. A summary of Ernst & Young LLPs
interaction with the company, the Board and Board Committees is set out on page 105 of the Annual Report.
Recommendation
The Board believes it is in the interests of Shareholders that the Board be given authority to
agree the external auditors remuneration and recommends, on the recommendation of the Audit
Committee, that you vote in favour of Resolution 4.
RESOLUTION 5 GRANT OF HYBRID RSUS
Resolution 5 asks Shareholders to approve the grant of restricted stock units (Hybrid RSUs) under
the companys Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) to the companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Mr L
Gries. The Hybrid RSUs are the same instrument as the Executive Incentive Plan RSUs previously
issued to the CEO, but have been renamed to better reflect their nature and eliminate confusion
with the cash-based STI Executive Incentive Plan.
The Board has determined that 40% of the CEOs LTI target will be payable in Hybrid RSUs. This
number is unchanged from fiscal year 2011.
The actual number of Hybrid RSUs the CEO will receive in June 2012 will depend on the companys
performance against corporate level EBIT performance targets for fiscal year 2012 approved by the
Board. Based on the CEOs performance and rating under the Scorecard described below (between 0
and 100), the Board will exercise negative discretion so that between 0 and 100% of the Hybrid
RSUs granted in June 2012 actually vest and convert to Shares two years later in June 2014.
Hybrid RSUs will be granted to the CEO for no consideration. Subject to the performance hurdles
being met and the exercise of negative discretion by the Board under the Scorecard, the CEO will
be entitled to receive Shares upon vesting of the Hybrid RSUs for no consideration.
Reasons for granting Hybrid RSUs
The allocation of 40% of the CEOs target LTI to Hybrid RSUs reflects the Boards continued
concerns about the lack of stability in the US housing market as well as emphasising continued
profitability as the company seeks to attain its primary demand growth objectives. The Board
believes that this allocation remains a valid method to evaluate and reward the CEOs performance
in the absence of a market which is stable enough to set longer term (i.e. multi-year) financial
metrics for LTI purposes.
The Board believes that the Hybrid RSUs provide appropriate incentives to the CEO to balance the
growth components of the primary demand growth objectives of the company without sacrificing short to medium-term profitability. In
addition, the application of negative discretion under the Scorecard allows the Board to reduce
the number of Hybrid RSUs that ultimately vest if performance in fiscal year 2012 is not sustained
to the Boards satisfaction to the conclusion of fiscal year 2014.
The Scorecard can only be applied by the Board to exercise negative discretion. It cannot be
applied to enhance the maximum reward that can be received. The Board will monitor progress under
the Scorecard annually.
Key aspects of Hybrid RSUs
Hybrid RSUs will be granted in accordance with the terms of the LTIP. The LTIP was approved by
shareholders at the 2009 AGM. The following specific terms also apply to Hybrid RSUs.
EBIT Goal Setting: The Boards philosophy is that total target direct compensation should be
positioned at the market 75th percentile if stretch target performance goals approved by the Board
are met. The EBIT performance targets for the Hybrid RSUs are based on historical results.
Achievement of the EBIT goal (at which 100% of target is paid) will require improvement on the
average of the performance of the company for fiscal years 2009 to 2011, indexed to housing starts
and pulp prices. Such achievement would meet the Boards expectation that the companys results
will be in the top quartile of its listed US building products peer group, taking into account
the current business environment and outlook. The Remuneration Committee reviewed the EBIT goal
and payout schedule before it was approved by the Board.
EBIT Goal: The EBIT goal for the CEO is based on JHISEs consolidated results in US dollars,
indexed up or down using a set formula depending on whether housing starts and pulp prices
increase or decrease. The EBIT goal excludes legacy costs and exchange rate movements.
Performance period: An initial period of twelve months until the end of fiscal year 2012, at which
point the EBIT based payout schedule will determine the number of Hybrid RSUs to grant, and then a
further period of two years until June 2014 when the Board will assess the CEOs progress against
the Scorecard goals to determine the final number of Hybrid RSUs that vest. The overall
performance period is three years.
Possible grant: The CEO may earn between 0% and 300% of his target, depending on performance.
Grants of Hybrid RSUs will commence on a sliding scale paying nil at approximately 70% of the EBIT
goal, 100% of t arget if the EBIT goal is reached, and extra rewards for outperformance with a cap
of 300% of the target if approximately 135% of the EBIT goal is achieved. This is shown in the
payout schedule below. The payout schedule represents slightly reduced leverage from the goals of
fiscal year 2011.
Executive Incentive Program RSUs payout schedule
|
|
|
8
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF
THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Vesting Period: The Hybrid RSUs vest two years after they are granted. In June 2014 the Board will
exercise negative discretion based on the CEOs performance and rating under the Scorecard
(between 0 and 100) to determine what percentage (between 0 and 100%) of the Hybrid RSUs will vest
and convert into Shares, subject to the Hybrid RSUs vesting earlier in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the LTIP.
Conditions: Attainment of the 2012 EBIT goals will determine the number of Hybrid RSUs issued to
the CEO. The CEOs rating under the Scorecard will determine the percentage of the Hybrid RSUs
which vest in June 2014 and convert into Shares.
In effect, the Scorecard applies a holdback and forfeiture principle to ensure that the
short-term results in fiscal year 2012 which determined the number of Hybrid RSUs issued to the CEO
are not obtained at the expense of long-term sustainability.
Calculation of the Hybrid RSUs in June 2012 and June 2014 is described below:
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amount of LTI target received as Hybrid RSUs in the absence of long-term quantitative financial measures |
Worked Example
The following example of how the Hybrid RSUs operate based on the CEOs LTI target quantum of
US$3,100,000 (the fiscal year 2012 LTI target quantum), performance at approximately 106.5% of
EBIT for fiscal year 2012 and a Scorecard rating of 75 out of 100.
Based on 106.5% of the EBIT goal being achieved, the CEO would receive 150% of the portion of the
LTI target quantum received in Hybrid RSUs as follows:
|
|
40% x US$3,100,000 x 150% = US$1,860,000 to be settled in Hybrid RSUs in June 2012. At a value of US$6/Share this is equivalent
to 310,000 Hybrid RSUs. |
At the conclusion of the additional two-year performance period in June 2014, a number of Hybrid
RSUs are forfeited, based on the CEOs rating under the Scorecard:
|
|
310,000 RSUs x 75% = 232,500 Shares received |
Further details on the operation of the Scorecard
Scorecard
The Board introduced the Scorecard to ensure the CEOs continued focus on financial, strategic,
business, customer and people components, each of which are important contributors to long-term
creation of shareholder value. The Scorecard contains a number of key objectives, and the measures
the Board expects to see achieved for each of these objectives. The CEOs rating ultimately
depends on his contribution to the company achieving the Scorecard objectives. Although most of
the objectives in the Scorecard have quantitative targets, the company has not allocated a
specific weighting to any and the final Scorecard assessment will involve an element of judgment
by the Board. The Board may also give different ratings when assessing Scorecard performance for
the Hybrid RSUs and Scorecard LTI grants.
When the Scorecard for the Hybrid RSUs granted to the CEO in June 2012 is applied in June 2014,
all, some, or none of the Hybrid RSUs will vest and convert into Shares.
The Scorecard can only be applied by the Board to exercise negative discretion. It cannot be
applied to enhance the maximum reward that can be received.
Scorecard for fiscal year 2012
The Scorecard for the Hybrid RSUs for fiscal year 2012 is the same as in fiscal year 2011, except
that the Zero-to-Landfill objective has been expanded to a broader Manufacturing Efficiency Reset
objective. The company has made significant progress in each of the past three years reducing the
amount of materials sent to the landfill. The Manufacturing Efficiency Reset objective will be a
multi-year initiative building (and continuing) the waste reduction objectives of
Zero-to-Landfill but also focusing on increasing machine capabilities and product efficiencies.
Among other matters, this will support more energy efficient manufacturing.
The Board considers that the Scorecard continues to reflect the companys overall long terms
goals. The primary objectives of the Scorecard for fiscal year 2012, and the results for those
objectives over the last three years, are set out below. Further details of the Scorecard,
including the reasons the Board selected each objective, are set out in the 2011 Remuneration
Report on pages 41 to 62 of the 2011 Annual Report.
|
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measure |
|
Starting Point |
|
How measured |
|
Board requirement |
US Primary Demand
Growth (PDG)
|
|
PDG for the last three fiscal
years is as follows:
FY 11 3.8%
FY 10 6.1%
FY 09 3.0%
|
|
The percentage of
growth of the James
Hardie product
sales in standard
feet as compared to
the underlying
market (a
combination of new
housing starts and
the repair and
remodel market).
|
|
Minimum: Maintain relative to
market
Stretch: Primary
demand growth relative to
market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Product Mix Shift
|
|
This has focused primarily on
ColorPlus penetration.
FY11
results are commercial in
confidence but exceeded the
results in FY1008
|
|
Relative percentage
growth in US sales
volume of ColorPlus
as a percentage of
total exteriors
volume.
Expect growth in US
of Artisan line of
products.
|
|
Minimum: 5% annual
improvement in sales of
ColorPlus and Artisan
products
Stretch: 10% annual
improvement in sales of
ColorPlus and Artisan
products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
Efficiency Reset
|
|
In the past three years the
company continued to make
significant progress in
reducing the amount of
materials sent to the
landfill. The Manufacturing
Efficiency Reset initiative
will better align JHISEs
manufacturing philosophy and
approach with its product
leadership strategy.
|
|
Improvement in
material yield,
product
inefficiency
(PdI, being the
gap between the
actual throughput
rate of a product
and the throughput
rate of all
products), process
inefficiency
(PcI, the gap
between design
capacity and actual
throughput) and
manufacturing team
learning curve
progress.
|
|
Minimum: Review of
manufacturing metrics to
confirm manufacturing
performance is effectively
supporting the product
leadership strategy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safety
|
|
The incident rate (IR) and
severity rate (SR) over the
last three fiscal years were
as follows:
IR SR
FY 11 1.7 19
FY 10 1.7 37
FY 09 4.7 54
|
|
Incident Rate:
Recordable
incidents per
200,000 hours
worked
Severity rate: Days
lost per 200,000
hours worked
No fatalities
|
|
2.0 IR and 20 SR
No fatalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Positioning
|
|
The Group continues
to be highly
dependent on the US
fibre cement
exterior cladding
business.
|
|
As this measure can
take many different
forms, including
developing new
technologies,
expanding into new
product categories,
or expanding
geographically,
assessment against
this measure will
need to be
subjective.
|
|
It is not possible
to set a specific
goal for this
measure.
However,
the Board expects
that management
will continue to
diversify to
provide more
balance and greater
profit
opportunities to
the company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Issues
|
|
The re-domicile
project was
completed in mid
2010. The ASIC
proceedings and ATO
issues are at
appeals stage and
the loan facility
for the AICF is
concluded. The
companys
contribution to the
AICF in July 2011
is US $51.5
million.
|
|
Simplifying or
finding solutions
to the major legacy
issues facing the
company.
|
|
Minimum: Make
substantial
progress on legacy
issues
Stretch: Resolve or
address all legacy
issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing During the
Economic Crisis
|
|
At the end of the
2011 fiscal year,
total credit
facilities were
US$320 million and
net debt was US$40
million.
|
|
Ensure company
achieves an
appropriate capital
structure and
adequate funding
flexibility to
continue to make
medium to long-term
investment in the
business.
|
|
Achieve an
appropriate capital
structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talent Management/
Development
|
|
The company has a
strong management
team which has
delivered superior
results over the
past three years.
|
|
The Remuneration
Committee will
assess the current
state of
development and
capability of the
top managers in the
business.
|
|
It is not possible
to set a specific
goal for his
measure beyond
requiring that
management
capability be
retained and grown. |
|
|
|
10
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF
THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Maximum and actual number of Hybrid RSUs
The maximum number of Shares and Hybrid RSUs for which
approval is sought under this Resolution 5 is based on
the grant that would be made if the companys
performance warranted the maximum possible award for
fiscal year 2012 and the Board gave the CEO the maximum
possible rating of 100 under the Scorecard, and
therefore did not exercise negative discretion to reduce
the number of Hybrid RSUs which ultimately are to vest
and convert into Shares.
The actual number of Hybrid RSUs granted will be
determined by dividing the amount earned by the CEO
based on the EBIT goal by the average closing price of
the Shares on the 10 business days preceding the day of
grant, subject to the maximum specified in the
resolution.
Previous grants
The number of Hybrid RSUs (referred to as Executive
Incentive Program RSUs at the time) granted to the CEO
by the company in the past three years is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum approved |
Date of grant |
|
Number granted |
|
by shareholders |
7 June 2011 |
|
|
45,687 |
|
|
|
841,619 |
|
7 June 2010 |
|
|
360,267 |
|
|
|
827,143 |
|
15 May 2009 |
|
|
487,446 |
|
|
|
750,876 |
|
General
The company will not provide loans to the CEO in
relation to the issue of Hybrid RSUs. These Hybrid
RSUs will be granted to the CEO by no later than 12
months after the passing of Resolution 5.
Summary of the legal requirements for
seeking Shareholder approval
ASX Listing Rule 10.14 provides that a listed company
must not permit a director to acquire shares or rights
to be issued shares under an employee incentive scheme
without the approval of Shareholders by ordinary
resolution.
Section 162(m) of the US Internal Revenue
Code requires Shareholders to approve the performance
criteria for grants of Hybrid RSUs and these
performance criteria are set out in the explanatory
notes for this resolution.
Recommendation
The Board believes it is in the interests of
Shareholders that the issue of Hybrid RSUs over Shares
in the company to the CEO for fiscal year 2012 up to the
maximum number specified in Resolution 5 under the LTIP,
Scorecard and the
above terms and conditions be approved, and recommends
that you vote in favour of Resolutions 5.
RESOLUTION 6 RELATIVE TSR RSUS
Resolution 6 asks Shareholders to approve the grant of
RSUs with a Relative total shareholder return (TSR)
hurdle (Relative TSR RSUs) under the LTIP to the
companys CEO. Relative TSR RSUs convert to Shares if
the companys TSR performance meets or exceeds the
relative TSR performance hurdles.
The Board has
determined that 30% of the CEOs LTI target quantum for
fiscal year 2012 will be received in Relative TSR RSUs.
This number is unchanged from fiscal year 2011.
Relative TSR RSUs will be granted to the CEO for no
consideration. Subject to the performance hurdles being
met, the CEO will be entitled to receive Shares upon
vesting of the Relative TSR RSUs for no consideration.
Key aspects of Relative TSR RSUs
Relative TSR RSUs will be granted in accordance with
the terms of the LTIP. The LTIP was approved by
shareholders at the 2009 AGM. The following specific
terms also apply to Relative TSR RSUs.
Performance Criteria: The performance hurdles for Relative TSR RSUs will be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Relative TSR |
Performance against Peer Group |
|
RSUs vested |
<50th Percentile |
|
|
0 |
% |
50th Percentile |
|
|
33 |
% |
51st 74th Percentile |
|
Sliding Scale |
>75th Percentile |
|
|
100 |
% |
The peer group (Peer Group) comprises other companies
exposed to the US building materials market, which is
the companys major market. The Remuneration Committee
and Board requested the companys independent
advisors, Towers Watson, to conduct a review of the
composition of the peer group in 2011. The
Remuneration Committee and the Board adopted the
proposed peer group recommended by Towers Watson,
which is unchanged from 2010 and listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Acuity Brands, Inc
|
|
Louisiana-Pacific
Corp.
|
|
PGT Inc |
American
Woodmark Corp
|
|
Martin Marietta
Materials, Inc
|
|
Sherwin Williams Co
(The) |
Apogee Enterprises,
Inc
|
|
Masco Corporation
|
|
Simpson
Manufacturing Co. |
Armstrong World
Industries, Inc
|
|
MDU Resources
Group, Inc
|
|
Texas Industries, Inc |
Eagle Materials, Inc
|
|
Mohawk Industries Inc
|
|
Trex Co., Inc. |
Fortune Brands, Inc
|
|
Mueller Water
Products, Inc
|
|
USG Corp |
Headwaters, Inc
|
|
NCI Building Systems,
Inc
|
|
Valmont Industries,
Inc. |
Interface, Inc
|
|
Owens Corning
|
|
Vulcan Materials Co |
Lennox International,
Inc
|
|
Quanex Building
Products Corp
|
|
Valspar Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Watsco, Inc |
|
|
|
James Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011
|
|
11 |
Testing: The performance hurdle will be tested and
the Relative TSR RSUs may vest after three years from
the grant date. The performance hurdle is re-tested at
the end of each six month period following the third
anniversary until the fifth anniversary (with each
re-test extending the measurement period by a further
six months such that re-testing at the fifth
anniversary will be measured over a five year period)
and any unvested Relative TSR RSUs may vest on each
re-testing date if the relative TSR performance hurdles
are met.
Any Relative TSR RSUs that have not vested
after the fifth anniversary of the grant date will
lapse. This re-testing reflects the fact that the
companys Share price is subject to substantial
short-term fluctuations relating to public comment and
disclosures on a number of legacy issues facing the
company, including asbestos-related matters, and that
the CEO should be given the same opportunity as
Shareholders to delay action on their equity interests
when affected by short-term factors. Further volatility
may also be experienced in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis. In addition, this approach extends
the motivational potential of the Relative TSR RSUs
from three to five years and, accordingly, is more
effective from a cost benefit perspective.
Vesting
Period: Each Relative TSR RSU may vest on each testing
date between three and five years after their grant
date upon satisfaction of the performance hurdles
described above under Performance Criteria, subject
to the Relative TSR RSUs vesting earlier in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the LTIP.
Maximum and actual number of Relative TSR RSUs
The maximum number of Shares and Relative TSR RSUs for
which approval is sought is based on the grant that
would be made if the company equals or exceeds the 75th
percentile of performance against the Peer Group and
all the Relative TSR RSUs vest.
The actual number of Relative TSR RSUs granted will be
determined by dividing the amount of the maximum dollar
amount granted under the Relative TSR RSUs portion of
the LTI target by the value of the Relative TSR RSU,
using a Monte Carlo simulation, over the ten business
days preceding the date of grant, subject to the maximum
specified in the resolution.
Previous grants
The number of Relative TSR RSUs granted to the CEO by
the company in the past three years is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum approved |
Date of Grant |
|
Number granted |
|
by shareholders |
15 September 2010
|
|
|
577,255 |
|
|
|
730,707 |
|
15 September and 11
December 2009
|
|
|
316,646 |
|
|
|
736,207 |
|
15 September 2008
|
|
|
558,708 |
|
|
|
560,909 |
|
General
Relative TSR RSUs will be granted under the LTIP for no
consideration and the company will not provide loans to
the
CEO in relation to the issue of Relative TSR RSUs under
the LTIP. These Relative TSR RSUs will be issued to the
CEO within 12 months of the passing of Resolution 6.
Summary of the legal requirements for seeking Shareholder approval
The reasons for seeking shareholder approval are
the same as those set out for Resolution 5.
Recommendation
The Board believes it is in the interests of
Shareholders that the grant of Relative TSR RSUs to
the CEO under the LTIP subject to the above terms
and conditions be approved, and recommends that you
vote in favour of Resolution 6.
RESOLUTION 7 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Background
The 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (2001 Plan) was
originally adopted in September 2001 and is set
to expire on 26 September 2011.
The Listing Rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE
Listing Rules) require shareholders of an NYSE-listed
company to approve the adoption of a new, or the
extension or other material modification of an
existing, equity-compensation plan. As such, the NYSE
Listing Rules require the company to seek shareholder
approval of an amendment to the 2001 Plan to extend
its term for a further 10 years from 26 September 2011
to 26 September 2021.
The company is also seeking
shareholder approval pursuant to the NYSE Listing
Rules for certain other minor amendments to the 2001
Plan which reflect changes in legal, regulatory and
tax provisions and corporate governance practices
since the 2001 Plan was first approved.
Information about 2001 Plan
The employees eligible to receive equity incentives
under the 2001 Plan are select employees below the most
senior levels of employment in the company (who are
eligible to receive incentives under a different plan).
Most of the eligible employees are located in the
United States, where the companys largest business
operates. The 2001 Plan provides continuing flexibility
for the company to award equity-based compensation that
meets the ongoing objective of aligning compensation
with shareholder value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Jams Hardie Notice of Meeting 2011 |
AGENDA AND BUSINESS OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Key Changes from the Original Plan
If this resolution is approved, the key changes to
the amended and restated 2001 Plan are:
|
|
Term. The term of the 2001 Plan will be extended for
an additional 10 years, until 26 September 2021. |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units. The terms of restricted
stock units have been incorporated into the terms
of the 2001 Plan. |
|
|
|
No Discounted Options. Options cannot be granted with
exercise prices lower than the fair market value of
the underlying Shares on the grant date. |
|
|
|
No Repricing. If the exercise price of an option or
stock appreciation right is above the market value of
the Shares, it will be prohibited without shareholder
approval from reducing the exercise price of such an
option or stock appreciation right or exchanging such
an option or stock appreciation right for cash, or
other awards or a new option or stock appreciation
right at a reduced exercise price. |
|
|
|
No Dividends on Unearned Performance Awards. The
payment of dividends or dividend equivalent rights
on unearned performance awards is prohibited. |
Shares Subject to the 2001 Plan
The 2001 Plan was first approved with a maximum number
of 45,077,100 Shares able to be issued under the 2001
Plan (equivalent to approximately 10% of the companys
issued Share capital at the time the plan was approved).
Since that date 10,361,779 awards have vested to convert
into Shares and 10,252,937 of awards remain outstanding.
As at 31 May 2011, 24,462,384 Shares can still be issued
over the life of the 2001 Plan, whether it is to
terminate on 26 September 2011 or 26 September 2021.
Shareholders are not being asked to approve an increase
in this number of Shares.
A copy of the 2001 Plan (incorporating the proposed
changes described above) is available on the Companys
website, in the Investor Relations area, at
www.jameshardie.com.
Recommendation
The Board believes that the extension of the 2001 Plan
for a further 10 years is in the best interests of
Shareholders and recommends that you vote in favour of
the resolution.
Notice availability
Additional copies of this Notice of Meeting can be
downloaded from the Investor Relations section of our
website at www.jameshardie.com or they can be obtained
by contacting the companys registrar Computershare
using one of the methods set out under the Lodgement
Instructions on page 4 of this Notice of Meeting.
ARBN 097 829 895
Incorporated in Ireland. The liability of members is limited
Registration Number: 485719
Registered Office: Second Floor, Europa House,
Harcourt Centre, Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Lodge your vote:
|
|
|
|
|
Online: |
|
|
www.investorvote.com.au |
|
|
|
|
|
By Mail: |
|
|
Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited |
|
|
GPO Box 242 Melbourne |
|
|
Victoria 3001 Australia |
|
|
|
Alternatively you can fax
your form to (within
Australia) 1800 783 447
(outside Australia) +61 3
9473 2555 |
|
|
|
Online Subscribers: |
For Intermediary Online
subscribers only
(custodians)
www.intermediaryonline.com |
|
|
|
For all enquiries call: |
(within Australia) 1300 855 080
(outside Australia) +61 3 9415 4000 |
Voting Instruction Form - 2011 Annual General Meeting (AGM)
|
|
|
|
|
Vote online or view the Annual Report, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week:
www.investorvote.com.au |
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ Complete your Voting Instruction Form
|
|
|
Your secure access information is: |
|
|
|
Control Number: 134974 |
þ Access the Annual Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ Review and update your securityholding
|
|
|
PLEASE NOTE: For security reasons it is important that you keep your
SRN/HIN confidential. |
|
|
|
|
For your voting instruction to be effective it must be received by 4.30pm (AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011
How to Vote
By signing this Voting Instruction Form, you direct
CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Limited (CDN) to appoint the
Chairman of the meeting or a person designated by you as
its Nominated Proxy to vote the shares in the company held
by CDN on your behalf in respect of the resolutions to be
considered at the AGM to be held in Dublin, on 16 August
2011 and at any adjournment of that meeting, as indicated
on this form, and to vote or abstain in respect of any
procedural resolution as the Nominated Proxy (as
applicable) thinks fit.
If you want to apportion your vote, you must clearly enter
the portion to be voted in a particular manner in the box
opposite the resolution in Step 2 overleaf. This may be
done by specifying the number of shares underlying your
CUFS holding or the percentages of that holding.
If you vote in excess of 100% of your holding for the
resolution, your vote on the resolution will be invalid.
If you mark more than one box for the resolution, except
to show a portion in the manner discussed above, your
vote on that resolution will be invalid.
If you lodge the Voting Instruction Form prior to the AGM,
and complete your voting directions on that form, your
voting instructions may only be changed if you submit a
further Voting Instruction Form before the closing date at
4.30pm (AEST) on Sunday, 14 August 2011.
Attending the Meeting
CUFS holders may appoint themselves or someone else to
attend, speak and vote on their behalf at the AGM to be
held in Dublin and simultaneously broadcast in Sydney, on
16 August 2011. Corporate entities may also use this
option.
To allow the person you have appointed to attend and
speak at the AGM, or the simultaneous broadcast, please
choose Option B overleaf and lodge it with Computershare
by no later than 4.30pm (AEST) on 14 August 2011.
Computershare will keep a register of people appointed
to attend the AGM or the simultaneous broadcast. These
people will be required to provide appropriate
identification to receive an entry card to allow them to
speak and ask questions.
Instructing CDN to appoint the Chairman of the
meeting as its Nominated Proxy (Option A)
To instruct CDN to appoint the Chairman as its
Nominated Proxy to vote the shares underlying your CUFS:
Step 1 - Place a cross in the box next to Option A.
Step 2 - Place a mark or specify the number of shares or
percentage of your holding to be voted in one of the boxes
opposite the resolution. The shares underlying your CUFS
will be voted in accordance with this direction.
If you do not mark For, Against, or Abstain: (i) in
respect of resolutions 1, 2, 3 and 4, you acknowledge that
the Chairman of the meeting intends to vote undirected
proxies in favour of each of these resolutions, (ii) in
respect of resolutions 5 and 6, if you do not cross the box
in the section headed Chairman of the Meeting as CDNs
Nominated Proxy overleaf, the Chairman will not cast CDNs
votes on resolutions 5 and 6.
If you mark the Abstain box, you are directing the
Chairman (as CDNs Nominated Proxy) not to vote on the
resolution(s) and your votes will not be counted in
computing the required majority.
Instructing CDN to nominate a proxy of your choice (Option B)
To instruct CDN to appoint a Nominated Proxy of your
choice (other than the Chairman of the meeting) who may vote
the shares underlying your CUFS in person at James Hardies
AGM in Dublin, or the simultaneous meeting in Sydney: Step 1
- Fill in the name of the person you appoint as proxy in the
box at the top of the form overleaf.
Step 2 - Place a mark or specify the number of shares or
percentage of your holding to be voted in one of the boxes
opposite the resolution.
You may instruct CDN to appoint yourself or your nominee as
a proxy. If your Nominated Proxy fails to attend the
meeting, your vote will not be counted.
If you instruct CDN to appoint a person nominated by you as
Nominated Proxy but do not mark For, Against, or
Abstain, the Nominated Proxy may vote as he or she
determines at the meeting.
If you mark the Abstain box for a resolution, you are
directing the Nominated Proxy not to vote on the
resolution(s).
If you do not select either of Option A or Option B, and
the Voting Instruction Form is validly signed, you will be
deemed to have marked Option A.
Signing Instructions for Postal Forms
Individual: Where the CUFS holding is in one name, the
CUFS holder must sign. Joint Holding: Where the CUFS
holding is in more than one name, all of the CUFS holders
must sign.
Power of Attorney: If you have not already lodged the Power
of Attorney with the registry, please attach a certified
photocopy of the Power of Attorney to this form when you
return it.
Companies: Where the company has a Sole Director who is also
the Sole Company Secretary, this form must be signed by that
person. If the company does not have a Company Secretary, a
Sole Director can also sign alone. Otherwise this form must
be signed by a Director jointly with either another Director
or a Company Secretary. Please sign in the appropriate place
to indicate the office held.
Comments & Questions
If you have any comments or questions for the
company, please write them on the enclosed Question Form
and return with this Voting Instruction Form.
|
|
|
GO ONLINE TO VOTE,
|
|
|
or turn over to complete the form |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Change of address.
If incorrect,
mark this box and make the
correction in the
space to the left. |
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Instruction Form
|
|
Please mark x to indicate your directions |
|
|
|
CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Limited will vote as directed
(please mark box A OR insert a name in the space provided at B below) |
I/We, being a CUFS holder of the company, hereby instruct:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option A
|
|
|
|
|
Option B
|
|
Please write the name of the person (other than the Chairman) you would like to
attend and vote on your behalf. If you wish to attend, speak and vote at the meeting, write your own name.
|
o |
CDN to appoint the
Chairman of the
|
or
|
|
|
CDN to appoint the
following Nominated
|
|
meeting as its
Nominated Proxy
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy:
|
|
to attend, speak and vote the shares underlying my/our holding of CUFS at the AGM of James
Hardie Industries SE to be held on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 at the Hibernia II Room, Four Seasons
Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin, Ireland at 7.30am (Dublin time) and simultaneously broadcast to a
meeting to be held on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 at the Adelaide Room, Sofitel Sydney Wentworth,
61-101 Phillip Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia, at 4.30pm (AEST), and any adjournment of the
meeting.
If you complete neither of the options above, and the Voting Instruction Form has been validly
signed, then you will be deemed to have marked Option A.
|
|
Chairman of the meeting as CDNs Nominated Proxy |
|
o |
|
If the Chairman of the meeting is appointed as CDNs Nominated Proxy, or may be
appointed by default, and you do not wish to advise CDN how to direct the Chairman how to
vote as CDNs Nominated Proxy in respect of resolutions 5 and 6, please place a mark in the
box on the left. |
|
|
|
By marking this box, you acknowledge that the Chairman of the meeting may exercise CDNs
proxy even if they have an interest in the outcome of resolutions 5 and 6 and that votes cast
by the Chairman of the meeting for those resolutions other than as a proxy holder will be
disregarded because of that interest. |
|
|
|
If you do not mark this box, and you have not advised CDN how it should direct CDNs proxy to
vote, the Chairman will not cast CDNs votes on resolutions 5 and 6 and CDNs votes will not
be counted in calculating the required majority if a poll is called on those resolutions. |
|
|
|
If you tick this box, you note that the Chairman intends to vote undirected proxies on
Resolutions 5 and 6 in favour of those resolutions. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE FOR THE RESOLUTIONS.
|
|
|
Items of Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORDINARY BUSINESS |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Receiving and considering the financial statements and reports for the year ended 31 March 2011
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
2.
|
|
Adoption of the Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 March 2011
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
3. (a)
|
|
Re-election of Mr Michael Hammes as a director
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
3. (b)
|
|
Re-election of Mr Rudy van der Meer as a director
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
3. (c)
|
|
Re-election of Mr Louis Gries as a director
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
4.
|
|
Authority to fix External Auditors Remuneration
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
SPECIAL BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Grant of Hybrid Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) to Mr Louis Gries
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
6.
|
|
Grant of Relative TSR RSUs to Mr Louis Gries
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
7.
|
|
Amendment and Restatement of James Hardie Industries Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
This section must be signed in accordance with the instructions overleaf to
enable your directions to be implemented. |
|
|
|
|
|
Individual or Securityholder
|
|
Securityholder 2
|
|
Securityholder 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sole Director and Sole Company
Secretary
|
|
Director
|
|
Director/Company Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact
|
|
|
|
Daytime |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
/
/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J H X
|
|
1 3 2 4 0 3 A
|
|
|
+ |
We want to make it easy for as many James Hardie
CUFS holders as possible to ask questions of the
companys Directors.
Please use the other side of this form to send us any
questions you would like answered at the Annual General
Meeting to be held in Dublin on 16 August 2011 and
simultaneously broadcast to a meeting in Sydney. We
believe this process will make it easier for more
holders to have questions answered, whether or not they
can attend either meeting. Holders will also be able to
ask questions from the floor at either meeting.
We will attempt to answer as many questions as possible
in the addresses by the Chairman and the CEO. If we
receive a large number of questions from holders, we
may not be able to reply individually.
You can use this form even if you will be attending the
meeting. If you are unable to attend, you can watch a
live webcast of the meeting via the internet on the
Investor Relations website at www.jameshardie.com
Fax this form by Thursday, 11 August
2011 to: (02) 8274 5218 or +61 2 8274
5218
Mail this form by Tuesday, 9 August
2011: using the Business Reply
Envelope enclosed
Holders name:
Address:
Security Holder Reference
Number or Holder
Identification Number: |
|
|
|
Fax this form by Thursday, 11 August 2011 to:
|
|
Security Holder Reference Number |
(02) 8274 5218 or +61 2 8274 5218
|
|
or Holder Identification Number: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mail this form by Tuesday, 9 August 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
using the Business Reply Envelope enclosed |
|
|
Question(s):