Exhibit 99.1
For analyst and media enquiries please
call Sean OSullivan on +61 2 8274 5239
28 April 2009
Chilean Litigation
James Hardie announced today that on 24 April 2009 a trial court in Santiago, Chile awarded
the equivalent of US$13.4 million against Fibrocementos Volcan Limitada (FC Volcan, the
former James Hardie Chilean entity), in civil litigation brought by Industria Cementa
Limitada (Cementa) in 2007. FC Volcan is appealing the decision to the Santiago Court of
Appeal.
Cementa, a fibre cement manufacturer in Chile, commenced actions in 2003 against FC Volcan,
alleging that it had engaged in predatory pricing, by selling products below cost when it
entered the Chilean market, in breach of the relevant anti-trust laws in Chile. Another
fibre cement manufacturer in Chile, Quimel Sociedad Anonima, also has an action pending
against FC Volcan with similar allegations, for which a decision is expected within the next
month.
As these actions existed prior to James Hardies sale of its Chilean business in July 2005,
the company had agreed to indemnify the buyers, Compania Industrial El Volcan S.A. and
Forestal Peumo S.A. (collectively, Volcan), subject to certain conditions, for damages or
penalties awarded against FC Volcan in relation to such proceedings, and the company retained
conduct of the defence of the matters.
James Hardie has previously made a provision for these matters, which it viewed as adequate
prior to the Court decision announced on 24 April 2009, the amount of which it is not
disclosing, at this time, because of its commercial sensitivity. The company will be
reviewing the adequacy of the provisions for these actions prior to the release of its
results for the year ended 31 March 2009, scheduled for 20 May 2009.
The company is also reviewing the Courts decision, as well as its position regarding its
indemnification of Volcan.
END
Background Information
Chilean Operations. James Hardie commenced operations in Chile in 2001 following the
acquisition and upgrading of a fibre cement manufacturing facility in
Santiago. The company sold its business in July 2005 due to its small scale and limited
strategic fit.
Anti-trust Proceedings. On 13 June 2006 the Chilean Anti-trust Court found in favour
of James Hardies Chilean company, with respect to allegations, which it denied then and
continues to deny, that it had engaged in predatory pricing, by selling products below cost
when it entered the Chilean market, in breach of the relevant anti-trust laws in Chile. The
Chilean Supreme Court reversed this decision on appeal in late November 2006 by a majority of
3 to 2. There was no right of appeal from this decision. FC Volcan paid the awarded penalty
in 2006 to the Chilean Government of approximately US$720,000 equivalent, which amount was
reimbursed by James Hardie. Following this decision, Cementa and Quimel commenced their
actions against FC Volcan.
1 of 3
Media/Analyst Enquiries:
Sean OSullivan
Vice President, Investor and Media Relations
Disclaimer
This company statement contains forward-looking statements. We may from time to time make
forward-looking statements in our periodic reports filed with or furnished to the US
Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 20-F and 6-K, in our annual reports to
shareholders, in offering circulars, invitation memoranda and prospectuses, in media releases
and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or
employees to analysts, institutional investors, existing and potential lenders,
representatives of the media and others. Statements that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements and for US purposes such forward-looking statements are statements
made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include:
§ |
|
statements about our future performance; |
|
§ |
|
projections of our results of operations or financial condition; |
|
§ |
|
statements regarding our plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to our
strategies, initiatives, competition, acquisitions, dispositions and/or our products; |
|
§ |
|
expectations concerning the costs associated with the suspension or closure of
operations at any of our plants and future plans with respect to any such plants; |
|
§ |
|
expectations that our credit facilities will be extended or renewed; |
|
§ |
|
expectations concerning dividend payments; |
|
§ |
|
statements concerning our corporate and tax domiciles and potential changes to them; |
|
§ |
|
statements regarding tax liabilities and related audits and proceedings; |
|
§ |
|
statements as to the possible consequences of proceedings brought against us and
certain of our former directors and officers by the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission; |
|
§ |
|
expectations about the timing and amount of contributions to the Asbestos Injuries
Compensation Fund, a special purpose fund for the compensation of proven Australian
asbestos-related personal injury and death claims; |
|
§ |
|
expectations concerning indemnification obligations; and |
|
§ |
|
statements about product or environmental liabilities. |
Words such as believe, anticipate, plan, expect, intend, target, estimate,
project, predict, forecast, guideline, aim, will, should, continue and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the
exclusive means of identifying such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements and all such forward-looking statements are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the following cautionary statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions and because
forward-looking statements address future results, events and conditions, they, by their very
nature, involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Such known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or other achievements to differ
materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed, projected or
implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors, some of which are discussed
under Key Information Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F
filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on 8 July 2008, include but are not
limited to: all matters relating to or arising out of the prior manufacture of products that
contained asbestos by our current and former subsidiaries; required contributions to the
Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund and the effect of currency exchange rate movements on the
amount recorded in our financial statements as an asbestos liability; compliance with and
changes in tax laws and treatments; competition and product pricing in the markets in which
we operate; the consequences of product failures or defects; exposure to environmental,
asbestos or other legal proceedings; general economic and market conditions; the supply and
cost of
2 of 3