Exhibit 99.1
For analyst and media enquiries please
call Sean O Sullivan on: +61 2 8274 5239
20 May 2009
4th quarter net operating profit US$7.2m
Full year net operating profit US$96.9m
(Both excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and tax adjustments)
James Hardie today announced a US$7.2 million net operating profit, excluding asbestos, ASIC
expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments, for the quarter ended 31 March 2009, a
decrease of 57% compared to the same period last year.
For the quarter, net operating loss including asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and
tax adjustments was US$129.6 million (mainly due to the change in the actuarial estimate of
the companys asbestos liability), compared to US$146.9 million for the same quarter last
year.
Full year net operating profit excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax
adjustments, decreased 44% to US$96.9 million from US$173.8 million. Including asbestos, ASIC
expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments, net operating profit increased from a loss
of US$71.6 million to a profit of US$136.3 million.
Operating results were significantly affected by further declines in the USA Fibre Cement
business, where sales declined compared to sales in the corresponding quarter of the previous
year, for the seventh consecutive quarter.
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) reported US housing starts of a
seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 510,000 units in March 2009, down 77% from the January
2006 peak of 2.265 million starts. The NAHB also reported US housing starts of a
seasonally-adjusted annual rate for the quarter ended 31 March 2009 of 523,000 units, down
50% from the 1.053 million units for the corresponding quarter in the previous year. For the
year ended 31 March 2009, the NAHB reported US housing starts of 787,400 units, down 38% from
1,262.6 million units for the year ended 31 March 2008.
Dividend
The company announced on 17 November 2008 that the Board had decided to omit the interim
dividend for the current fiscal year and that the company would continue to review its
dividend policy, but that it was likely dividends would be suspended until conditions
improved significantly. Having undertaken a further review of the companys dividend policy,
the Board has decided to omit the year-end dividend to conserve capital. Until such time as
market and global economic conditions improve significantly and the level of uncertainty
surrounding future industry trends as well as company specific contingencies dissipates, it
is anticipated the company will continue to omit dividends in order to conserve capital.
In this Media Release, James Hardie may present financial measures, sales volume terms,
financial ratios, and Non-US GAAP financial measures included in the Definitions section of
this document starting on page 9. The company presents financial measures that it believes
are customarily used by its Australian investors. Specifically, these financial measures,
which are equivalent or derived from certain GAAP measures as explained in the definitions,
include EBIT, EBIT margin, Operating profit and Net operating profit. The company may
also present other terms for measuring its sales volumes (million square feet or mmsf and
thousand square feet or msf); financial ratios (Gearing ratio, Net interest expense
cover, Net interest paid cover, Net debt payback, Net debt (cash); and Non-US GAAP
financial measures (EBIT excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments, EBIT
margin excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments, Net operating profit
excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments, Diluted earnings
per share excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments,
Operating profit before income taxes excluding asbestos and asset impairments, Effective tax rate excluding asbestos, asset impairments and tax
adjustments, EBITDA and Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities excluding
payments to the AICF and ATO settlement payment). Unless otherwise stated, results and
comparisons are of the 4th quarter and the full year of FY09 versus the
4th quarter and the full year of the prior fiscal year.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
1
Operating Performance
Fourth quarter net sales decreased 23% to US$241.3 million, gross profit was down 35% to
US$69.2 million and EBIT excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments was 61%
lower at US$17.1 million, compared to the same period last year. Fourth quarter EBIT loss
including asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments decreased from US$181.5 million to
US$160.4 million.
Full year net sales decreased 18% to US$1,202.6 million, gross profit was down 27% to
US$388.8 million and EBIT excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments decreased
40% to US$170.9 million, compared to last year. EBIT including asbestos, ASIC expenses and
asset impairments improved from a loss of US$36.6 million to a profit of US$173.6 million.
Net sales of the USA and Europe Fibre Cement business decreased 21% for both the quarter and
the full year. USA and Europe Fibre Cement EBIT was down 32% to US$32.3 million and 35% to
US$199.3 million for the quarter and full year, respectively, as a result of lower sales
volumes and higher costs.
Asia Pacific Fibre Cement net sales were down 28% and 8% for the quarter and full year,
respectively. Asia Pacific EBIT decreased 37% and 6% to US$6.7 million and US$47.1 million
for the quarter and the full year, respectively, primarily due to unfavourable currency
exchange rate movements of the Asia Pacific business currencies compared to the US dollar.
Diluted loss per share for the quarter decreased from US33.8 cents per share to US30.0 cents
per share. For the full year, diluted earnings per share improved from a loss of US15.7 cents
per share to earnings of US31.4 cents per share.
Diluted earnings per share excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax
adjustments decreased from US3.8 cents to US1.7 cents for the quarter and decreased by 42%
from US38.1 cents to US22.3 cents for the full year.
4th Quarter and Full Year at a Glance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
US $ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
241.3 |
|
|
$ |
312.9 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
$ |
1,202.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,468.8 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
69.2 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
388.8 |
|
|
|
530.0 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT excluding asbestos,
ASIC expenses and
asset impairments |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
170.9 |
|
|
|
287.2 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
|
(176.5 |
) |
|
|
(182.3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(240.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC expenses |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
|
(160.4 |
) |
|
|
(181.5 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
173.6 |
|
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(129.6 |
) |
|
|
(146.9 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
136.3 |
|
|
|
(71.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss ) earnings per
share (US cents ) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
(33.8 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
2
Net operating profit excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments
decreased 57% for the quarter to US$7.2 million and was 44% lower for the full year at
US$96.9 million, as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
Net operating (loss) profit |
|
$ |
(129.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(146.9 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
$ |
136.3 |
|
|
$ |
(71.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
240.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
AICF SG&A expenses |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
AICF interest income |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Impairment of AICF investments |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to asbestos
adjustments |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC expenses (net of tax) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment related costs (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax adjustments |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating profit excluding asbestos,
ASIC expenses, asset impairments
and tax adjustments |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
$ |
96.9 |
|
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share excluding
asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset
impairments and tax adjustments
(US cents) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
CEO Commentary
The companys results continue to be significantly affected by the on-going deterioration of
its major market, the US residential construction market, where housing starts for March 2009
reached a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 510,000 units, down approximately 75% from the
January 2006 peak of over two million starts.
In a challenging environment, we continue to pursue our strategy of generating primary
demand growth for fibre cement and leveraging our technology to offer differentiated products
with superior value, said James Hardie CEO Louis Gries. Our ColorPlus range of products,
which accounts for an increasing share of our exterior sales, is a good example of the
on-going success of this strategy.
Mr Gries added, We are adjusting and managing our production schedules in an on-going effort
to match output with demand to optimise our inventory and service position in the downturn.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
3
USA and Europe Fibre Cement
Fourth quarter net sales were down 21% compared to the same quarter last year, to US$188.7
million. Sales volume decreased 23% to 308.3 million square feet, and the average net sales
price increased 3% from US$597 to US$612 per thousand square feet.
For the full year, net sales were down 21% compared to last year, to US$929.3 million. Sales
volume decreased 22% to 1,526.6 million square feet, and the average net sales price was 2%
higher at US$609 per thousand square feet.
Sales in our USA Fibre Cement business declined compared to sales in the corresponding
quarter in the previous year, for the seventh consecutive quarter. This was primarily as a
result of the ongoing weakness in the US housing market, where both new construction and the
repair and remodel segments of the market have continued to deteriorate.
Sales volumes decreased 23% in the quarter compared to the same period last year, reflecting
a 25% decline in exterior products and a 16% decline in interior products. Product demand
was lower across all regions. Our ColorPlus® range of products has again contributed to
primary demand growth, achieving a 5% increase in sales volume as a percentage of total
exterior sales volume in the northern region of the US.
EBIT for the quarter was 32% lower at US$32.3 million, primarily due to reduced gross profit
performance, which resulted from lower sales volume and higher average unit manufacturing
costs. The higher average unit manufacturing costs were a result of fixed costs being
absorbed over significantly reduced volume. The EBIT margin was 17.1% for the quarter
compared to 19.8% for the corresponding period last year. For the full year, EBIT was 35%
lower at US$199.3 million and the EBIT margin was 21.4% compared to 26.2% for last year.
Asia Pacific Fibre Cement
Net sales decreased 28% to US$52.6 million for the quarter. In Australian dollars, net sales
decreased 2% due to a 6% decrease in sales volume, partially offset by a 4% increase in the
average Australian dollar net sales price.
For the full year, net sales decreased 8% to US$273.3 million. In Australian dollars, net
sales were flat, due to a 2% increase in average Australian dollar net sales price, offset by
a 2% decrease in sales volume.
Despite the overall market downturn, the Australian business improved its sales result in the
fourth quarter. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data shows seasonally-adjusted
total dwelling unit approvals were down 23% to 29,856 for the March quarter compared to the
same period last year. For the year ended 31 March 2009, the ABS reported total dwelling unit
approvals of 134,499 units, down 14% from 156,697 unit approvals for the year ended 31 March
2008.
In New Zealand, construction continued to decline, with total residential approvals for the
year ended 31 March 2009 down 34% to 16,200 units compared to the prior year. The Philippines
business reported lower sales volume and revenue as a result of a softening domestic market.
Asia Pacific EBIT was 37% lower for the quarter at US$6.7 million, primarily due to
unfavourable currency exchange rate movements in the Asia Pacific business currencies
compared to the US dollar. In Australian dollars, Asia Pacific Fibre Cement EBIT decreased
4% for the quarter due to lower gross margin performance, partially offset by lower SG&A
expenses.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
4
For the full year, Asia Pacific EBIT was 6% lower at US$47.1 million. In Australian dollars,
EBIT increased 4% for the full year mainly due to decreased SG&A expenses, partially offset
by lower gross margin performance. The EBIT margin was 12.7% and 17.2% for the quarter and
full year, respectively, compared with 14.6% and 16.9% for the same periods last year.
Cash Flow
Net operating cash flow for the full year ended 31 March 2009 moved from cash provided of
US$319.3 million in the prior year to cash used of US$45.2 million. The decrease was driven
primarily by the ATO settlement payment of US$101.6 million, quarterly instalment payments to
the AICF totaling US$110.0 million and the reduced contribution from the USA and Europe Fibre
Cement business. Net cash provided from operating activities excluding contributions to the
AICF and the ATO settlement payment was US$166.4 million for the full year ended 31 March
2009 compared with US$319.3 million for the full year ended 31 March 2008.
Capital expenditures for the purchase of property, plant and equipment for the full year
ended 31 March 2009 decreased to US$26.1 million, from US$38.5 million in the prior year.
Asbestos Adjustments
The effects of asbestos adjustments on EBIT for the quarter and full year ended 31 March 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
Q4 FY 2009 |
|
Q4 FY 2008 |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Change in estimates |
|
$ |
(162.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(154.1 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(162.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(152.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign
exchange movements |
|
$ |
(14.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
$ |
179.7 |
|
|
$ |
(87.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
$ |
(176.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(182.3 |
) |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
(240.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readers are referred to Note 11 of the companys 31 March 2009 Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on the asbestos adjustments.
Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund (AICF) Funding
As announced on 23 April 2009 the company was advised by the AICF that the AICF Board of
Directors has determined that it is reasonably foreseeable that, within two years, the
available assets of the AICF are likely to be insufficient to fund the payment of all
reasonably foreseeable liabilities. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Final
Funding Agreement (AFFA) the company is not required to make a contribution to the AICF in
fiscal year 2010. In addition, the company disclosed that it is not in a position to make
contributions to the AICF beyond the obligations set out under the terms of the AFFA.
Readers are referred to the Company Statement released on 23 April 2009 for further
information on AICF funding.
ASIC Proceedings
For the three months and full year ended 31 March 2009, the company has incurred legal costs
related to the ASIC proceedings, noted as ASIC expenses, of US$1.7 million and US$14.0
million, respectively. For the three months and full year ended 31 March 2008, the company
incurred ASIC expenses of US$1.1 million and US$5.5 million, respectively. ASIC expenses are
included in SG&A expenses.
The companys net costs in relation to the ASIC proceedings from February 2007 to 31 March
2009 total US$19.7 million.
Readers are referred to Note 13 of the companys 31 March 2009 Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on the ASIC Proceedings.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
5
Chile Litigation
On 24 April 2009 a trial court in Santiago, Chile awarded damages in the equivalent of
US$13.4 million against Fibrocementos Volcan Limitada (FC Volcan, the former James Hardie
Chilean entity), in civil litigation brought by Industria Cementa Limitada (Cementa) in 2007.
FC Volcan is appealing the decision to the Santiago Court of Appeal.
The company denied and continues to deny allegations of predatory pricing in Chile. The
company retained conduct of the appeal of this civil damages matter. The company intends to
vigorously pursue all appellate and other alternatives as it does not concur with the
decision of the trial court. The company also intends to exercise its rights under
indemnification provisions, including applicable conditions and limitations.
As at 31 March 2009 management has adequately provided for this contingency as required under
US GAAP Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 (SFAS 5) Accounting for
Contingencies.
Readers are referred to Managements Analysis of Results and Note 13 of the companys 31
March 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Chile Litigation.
Income Tax
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
Income tax benefit for the quarter increased from US$36.8 million to US$46.7 million. For the
full year, income tax expense decreased from US$36.1 million to US$19.5 million. The
companys effective tax rate on earnings excluding asbestos, asset impairments and tax
adjustments was 52.8% and 41.4% for the quarter and full year, respectively, compared to
58.8% and 37.9% for the same quarter and full year of the prior period. The change in
effective tax rates compared with last year is attributable to changes in the geographic mix
of earnings and expenses.
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) 1999 Disputed Amended Assessment
In March 2006, RCI Pty Ltd (RCI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, received an
amended assessment from the ATO in respect of RCIs income tax return for the year ended 31
March 1999.
On 30 May 2007, the ATO issued a Notice of Decision disallowing the companys objection to
the amended assessment (Objection Decision). On 11 July 2007, the company filed an
application appealing the Objection Decision with the Federal Court of Australia. The hearing
is scheduled to take place no later than September 2009.
The company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax position reported in RCIs
tax return for the 1999 fiscal year will be upheld on appeal. Therefore, the company believes
that the requirements under FIN 48 for recording a liability have not been met and
accordingly it has not recorded any liability at 31 March 2009 for the amended assessment.
The company expects that amounts paid in respect of the amended assessment will be recovered
by RCI (with interest) at the time RCI is successful in its appeal against the amended
assessment. As a result, the company has treated all payments in respect of the amended
assessment that have been made up to 31 March 2009 as a deposit and it is the companys
intention to treat any payments to be made at a later date as a deposit. As at 31
March 2009 and 2008, this deposit totalled US$173.5 million and US$205.8 million,
respectively.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
6
ATO Settlement
As announced on 12 December 2008, the company and the ATO reached an agreement that finalises
tax audits being conducted by the ATO on the companys Australian income tax returns for the
years ended 31 March 2002 and 31 March 2004 through 31 March 2006 and settled all outstanding
issues arising from these tax audits. With the exception of the assessment in respect of RCI
for the 1999 financial year, the settlement concluded ATO audit activities for all years
prior to the year ended 31 March 2007.
The agreed settlement, made without concessions or admissions of liability by either the
company or the ATO, required the company to pay an amount of A$153.0 million (US$101.6
million) in December 2008.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA)
On 23 June 2008, the IRS issued the company with a NOPA that concluded that the company did
not qualify for the United States Netherlands Treaty Limitations on Benefits (LOB)
provision of the US-Netherlands Treaty applying from early 2006 and that accordingly it was
not entitled to beneficial withholding tax rates on payments from the companys United States
subsidiaries to its Netherlands companies for the calendar years 2006 and 2007.
On 15 April 2009, the company announced that the Appeals Division of the IRS had entered into
a settlement agreement with the companys subsidiaries in which the IRS conceded its position
in full with regard to its assertion in the NOPA. The IRS has concluded that, for those
years, the company is entitled to reduced withholding tax rates under the LOB for certain
payments from the companys United States subsidiaries to its Netherlands companies. This
settlement outcome has had no impact on the companys results. This agreement applies only
to the 2006 and 2007 calendar years and does not affect or limit the IRS ability to
challenge the companys qualification for benefits in later years.
Outlook
In its January 2009 issue of The National Outlook, The US National Association of Home
Builders (NAHB) baseline housing forecast shows large declines for new-home sales and
housing starts for 2009 as a whole, with production coming in at the lowest level of the
entire post-World War II period. However, the NAHB expects housing activity to stabilise
around the middle of the calendar year, at least in the single-family sector, followed by a
relatively slow recovery process later this year and in 2010 as remaining supply overhang and
serious constraints on credit for housing production draw out the long climb back to
demographically-based trend levels of housing starts.
The outlook for the US residential repair and remodel market is also unclear, but is expected
to weaken, affected by a fall in house values and subsequent reduction in owners equity.
The repair and remodel sector is now estimated to represent more than 50% of our US business.
Housing starts in Australia are expected to continue to fall in 2009-2010. Activity in medium
density dwellings and renovations may provide some growth and may partially offset the
overall housing market decline.
Residential housing consents in New Zealand are at a 25 year low and the commercial market,
while more buoyant, is showing signs of weakening, although we are achieving good penetration
with differentiated products. Housing affordability is expected to remain under pressure with
increased building costs. Fiscal year 2010 is expected to see sales demand
continue below last years levels, although this may be partially offset by the release of
new products.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
7
The Philippines economy is expected to slow and the currency to weaken in the face of global
economic conditions. Strong competition is expected to continue in the domestic market place
and competitive pricing practices will continue to challenge our existing export markets.
Changes in the companys asbestos liability (to reflect changes in foreign exchange rates or
updates of the actuarial estimate), ASIC proceedings, income tax related issues and other
matters referred to in the disclaimer at the end of this document may have a material impact
on the companys consolidated financial statements. Readers are referred to Notes 11, 13 and
14 of the companys 31 March 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements for more information
about the companys asbestos liability, ASIC proceedings and income tax related issues.
END
Media/Analyst Enquiries:
Sean O Sullivan
Vice President Investor and Media Relations
This Media Release forms part of a package of information about the companys results. It
should be read in conjunction with the other parts of the package, including the Managements
Analysis of Results, the Management Presentation and the Consolidated Financial Statements.
These documents, along with a webcast of the management presentation on 20 May 2009, are
available from the Investor Relations area of James Hardies website at: www.jameshardie.com
The company routinely posts information that may be of importance to investors in the
Investor Relations section of its website, including press releases, financial results and
other information. The company encourages investors to consult this section of its website
regularly.
The company lodged its annual filing for the year ended 31 March 2008 with the SEC on 8 July
2008.
All holders of the companys securities may receive, on request, a hard copy of our complete
audited financial statements, free of charge. Requests can be made via the company website
or by contacting one of the companys corporate offices. Contact details are available on
the companys website.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
8
Definitions
Financial Measures US GAAP equivalents
EBIT and EBIT margin EBIT, as used in this document, is equivalent to the US GAAP
measure of operating income. EBIT margin is defined as EBIT as a percentage of net sales.
James Hardie believes EBIT and EBIT margin to be relevant and useful information as these are
the primary measures used by management to measure the operating profit or loss of its
business. EBIT is one of several metrics used by management to measure the earnings generated
by the companys operations, excluding interest and income tax expenses. Additionally, EBIT
is believed to be a primary measure and terminology used by its Australian investors. EBIT
and EBIT margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other
measures of financial performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. EBIT and EBIT margin, as the company has defined
them, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Operating profit is equivalent to the US GAAP measure of income.
Net operating profit is equivalent to the US GAAP measure of net income.
Sales Volumes
mmsf million square feet, where a square foot is defined as a standard square foot
of 5/16 thickness.
msf thousand square feet, where a square foot is defined as a standard square foot
of 5/16 thickness.
Financial Ratios
Gearing Ratio Net debt (cash) divided by net debt (cash) plus shareholders equity.
Net interest expense cover EBIT divided by net interest expense.
Net interest paid cover EBIT divided by cash paid during the period for interest,
net of amounts capitalised.
Net debt payback Net debt (cash) divided by cash flow from operations.
Net debt (cash) short-term and long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
9
Non-US GAAP Financial Measures
EBIT and EBIT margin excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments EBIT
and EBIT margin excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses and asset impairments are not measures of
financial performance under US GAAP and should not be considered to be more meaningful than
EBIT and EBIT margin. James Hardie has included these financial measures to provide investors
with an alternative method for assessing its operating results in a manner that is focussed
on the performance of its ongoing operations and provides useful information regarding its
financial condition and results of operations. The company uses these non-US GAAP measures
for the same purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
EBIT |
|
$ |
(160.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(181.5 |
) |
|
$ |
173.6 |
|
|
$ |
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
240.1 |
|
AICF SG&A expenses |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC expenses |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
Impairment related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
EBIT excluding asbestos, ASIC
expenses and asset impairments |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
170.9 |
|
|
|
287.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
241.3 |
|
|
$ |
312.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,202.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,468.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT margin excluding asbestos, ASIC
expenses and asset impairments |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Net operating profit excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax
adjustments Net operating profit excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments
and tax adjustments is not a measure of financial performance under US GAAP and should not be
considered to be more meaningful than net income. The company has included this financial
measure to provide investors with an alternative method for assessing its operating results
in a manner that is focussed on the performance of its ongoing operations. The company uses
this non-US GAAP measure for the same purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Net operating (loss) profit |
|
$ |
(129.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(146.9 |
) |
|
$ |
136.3 |
|
|
$ |
(71.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
240.1 |
|
AICF SG&A expenses |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
AICF interest income |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Impairment of AICF investments |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to asbestos
adjustments |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
|
ASIC expenses (net of tax) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
Impairment related costs (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
Tax adjustments |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
Net operating profit excluding asbestos,
ASIC expenses, asset impairments
and tax adjustments |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
96.9 |
|
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
|
|
|
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
10
Diluted earnings per share excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset impairments and tax
adjustments Diluted earnings per share excluding asbestos, ASIC expenses, asset
impairments and tax adjustments is not a measure of financial performance under US GAAP and
should not be considered to be more meaningful than diluted earnings per share. The company
has included this financial measure to provide investors with an alternative method for
assessing its operating results in a manner that is focussed on the performance of its
ongoing operations. The companys management uses this non-US GAAP measure for the same
purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Net operating profit excluding asbestos, ASIC
expenses, asset impairments and tax adjustments |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
96.9 |
|
|
$ |
173.8 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding -
Diluted (millions) |
|
|
435.6 |
|
|
|
434.6 |
|
|
|
434.5 |
|
|
|
456.1 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share excluding asbestos,
ASIC expenses, asset impairments and
tax adjustments (US cents) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate excluding asbestos and tax adjustments Effective tax rate
excluding asbestos and tax adjustments is not a measure of financial performance under US
GAAP and should not be considered to be more meaningful than effective tax rate. The company
has included this financial measure to provide investors with an alternative method for
assessing its operating results in a manner that is focussed on the performance of its
ongoing operations. The companys management uses this non-US GAAP measure for the same
purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Operating (loss) profit before income taxes |
|
$ |
(176.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(183.7 |
) |
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
(35.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos adjustments |
|
|
176.5 |
|
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
240.1 |
|
AICF SG&A expenses |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
AICF interest income |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Impairment of AICF investments |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
Impairment related costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit before income taxes
excluding asbestos and asset impairments |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
|
$ |
273.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to asbestos adjustments |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(45.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
Tax adjustments |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense excluding asbestos, asset
impairments and tax adjustments |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
(61.0 |
) |
|
|
(103.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Effective tax rate excluding asbestos, asset
impairments and tax adjustments |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
|
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
11
EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under US GAAP and should not be
considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, income from operations, net income or
cash flows as defined by US GAAP or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. Not all
companies calculate EBITDA in the same manner as James Hardie has and, accordingly, EBITDA
may not be comparable with other companies. The company has included information concerning
EBITDA because it believes that this data is commonly used by investors to evaluate the
ability of a companys earnings from its core business operations to satisfy its debt,
capital expenditure and working capital requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
EBIT |
|
$ |
(160.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(181.5 |
) |
|
$ |
173.6 |
|
|
$ |
(36.6 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
(145.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(167.1 |
) |
|
$ |
230.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities excluding payments to the AICF and
ATO settlement payment Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities excluding
payments to the AICF and ATO settlement payment is not a measure of financial performance
under US GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than cash
flows as defined by US GAAP. The company has included this financial measure to provide
investors with an alternative method for assessing its operating results in a manner that is
focused on the performance of its ongoing operations. The companys management uses this
non-US GAAP measure for the same purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ Millions |
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2008 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(45.2 |
) |
|
$ |
319.3 |
|
Payment to the AICF |
|
|
110.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
ATO settlement payment |
|
|
101.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities excluding payment to the
AICF and ATO settlement payment |
|
$ |
166.4 |
|
|
$ |
319.3 |
|
|
|
|
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
12
Disclaimer
This Media Release contains forward-looking statements. We may from time to time make
forward-looking statements in our periodic reports filed with or furnished to the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 20-F and 6-K, in the annual reports to
shareholders, in offering circulars, invitation memoranda and prospectuses, in media releases
and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or
employees to analysts, institutional investors, existing and potential lenders,
representatives of the media and others. Statements that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements and for US purposes such forward-looking statements are statements
made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
statements about our future performance; |
|
|
|
|
projections of our results of operations or financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to our
strategies, initiatives, competition, acquisitions, dispositions and/or our products; |
|
|
|
|
expectations concerning the costs associated with the suspension or closure of
operations at any of our plants and future plans with respect to any such plants; |
|
|
|
|
expectations that our credit facilities will be extended or renewed; |
|
|
|
|
expectations concerning dividend payments; |
|
|
|
|
statements concerning our corporate and tax domiciles and potential changes to them; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding tax liabilities and related audits and proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
statements as to the possible consequences of proceedings brought against us and
certain of our former directors and officers by the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission; |
|
|
|
|
expectations about the timing and amount of contributions to the Asbestos Injuries
Compensation Fund, a special purpose fund for the compensation of proven Australian
asbestos-related personal injury and death claims; |
|
|
|
|
expectations concerning indemnification obligations; and |
|
|
|
|
statements about product or environmental liabilities. |
Words such as believe, anticipate, plan, expect, intend, target, estimate,
project, predict, forecast, guideline, aim, will, should, continue and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the
exclusive means of identifying such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements and all such forward-looking statements are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the following cautionary statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions and because
forward-looking statements address future results, events and conditions, they, by their very
nature, involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Such known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or other achievements to differ
materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed, projected or
implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors, some of which are discussed
under Key Information Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of the Form 20-F filed on 8 July
2008 with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, include but are not limited to: all
matters relating to or arising out of the prior manufacture of products that contained
asbestos by current and former James Hardie subsidiaries; required contributions to the AICF
and the effect of currency exchange rate movements on the amount recorded in our financial
statements as an asbestos liability; compliance with and changes in tax laws and treatments;
competition and product pricing in the markets in which we operate; the consequences of
product failures or defects; exposure to environmental, asbestos or other legal proceedings;
general economic and market conditions; the supply and cost of raw materials; the success of
research and development efforts; reliance on a small number of customers; compliance with
and changes in environmental and health and safety laws; risks of conducting business
internationally; compliance with and changes in laws and regulations; currency exchange
risks; the concentration of our customer base on large format retail customers, distributors
and dealers; the effect of natural disasters; changes in our key management personnel; and
all other risks identified in our reports filed with Australian, Dutch and US securities
agencies and exchanges (as appropriate). We caution you that the foregoing list of factors
is not exhaustive and that other risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ
materially from those in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date they are made and are statements of our current expectations concerning future
results, events and conditions.
Media Release: James Hardie 4th Quarter and Full Year FY09
13